Top 3 not conservatives
Each Presidential candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you agree with Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon's, secular progressive logic
that since I might not get caught by the police, MCI had a constitutional right to blantantly force me to commit felonies as a condition
of employement, subjecting me to possibly spending years in a federal penitentiary.
Requiring employees to potentially
"ROT IN PRISON"
is OK, because the employee might not get caught by the police.
In answering this question, each Presidential candidate is asked to assume that this was your son or daughter potentially
"ROTTING IN PRISON".
As President, will you support or condemn corporate corruption based on political contributions,
noting that Verizon has given many millions of dollars of political contributions to candidates
who help them commit these crimes???
Will you accept
BRIBES, ($15,340,542),
from Verizon in 2008???
Aug-03 MCI Executive management starts a campaign to convince stock holders, employees, and customers that MCI has been allegedly transformed into an ethical company. Dave Vermilyea and I spend the next eighteen months hounding Leon King, Pamela Hogg, and Frank Adams of the rampant use of illegal software in our department including HomeSite, MapXTreme, Oracle, Toad, and Microsoft Project.
8-22-03 I send an email to the FLPS project manager, Pamela Hogg, complaining of being forced to use stolen property against my will.
“Pamela, Can you export the project plan into Microsoft Word Format? I don’t th[i]nk we have a site license for Microsoft Project and I don’t have a personal copy. Thanks. Alvin”
Her response was to tell me where the pirated CD was located.
My department purchased only one copy of Toad in 2000 then required everyone in our group to feloniously load nnd
use this software as a condition of employment. If the makers of Toad had initiated a software raid during that
time, Rick Cassidy has already provided information to Ed McGinty that very clearly shows that Kavitha
Ranganathan would have had to testify under oath in a court of law that she was told on numerous occasions
by Dave Vermilyea that we only paid for one copy, if she told the truth under oath and was not pressured
by the company to commit perjury on this issue.
Will Ivan Seidenberg voluntarily provide verification of this purchase of only one copy to the Verizon
Audit Committee, or will Ivan Seidenberg only do this if ordered by the court?
Alvin Reed
Every 2008 Presidential Candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you consider a prognosis of situational anxiety
to the commission of felonies to be a legitimate reason to
retaliate
against an employee through wrongful termination.
-----------------------------
"...I am once again losing a lot of sleep over the issue of being pressured to
use software of questionable ownership..."
Alvin Reed in email to manager Frank Adams on January 31st, 2004, time stamped at 1:27 A.M. (middle of the night)
Alvin Reed was diagnosed with
caused directly by this forced
commission of felonies.
Alvin Reed's termination letter stated very cleary the reason for his termination: "prognosis of your doctor"
VERIZON CRIMINAL COVER UP
Verizon Ethics Line: (800) 856-1885
Please call Verizon CEO and DEMAND that he provide
TRUTHFUL information to the Verizon Audit Committee
and to immediately cease and desist putting tremendous pressure on Kavitha Ranganathan to commit perjury
Any reasonable person knows that if everything being stated on this website were not absolutely true,
Verizon would have gotten a judge to force this website to be taken down long ago
Our department could NOT have passed a software raid anytime during my employ
and everyone in our department knew that with absolute certainty
CEO of Verizon Communications who refuses to provide verification of ownership of
rampant stolen intellectual property possibly into the billions of dollars,
thus defrauding stockholders just like convicted felon Bernie Ebbers.
Ivan G. Seidenberg
(212) 395-1000
140 West Street
New York, NY 10007
You might not get caught; therefore, you MUST commit the felony
Secular Progressive Logic
2-04-04 I send an email to my manager, Frank Adams, complaining of being forced to use stolen property against my will.
“Frank. For the record. I have loaded a copy of Homesite V4.5.1 SN HS45PE-3997633545 onto my computer using
what is obviously a bootlegged CD
based on your email assurance that we have sufficient licenses on file to cover this software. Alvin. Copy to File.”
My mental state at this point for putting “Copy to File” on the bottom of my email was for my own protection if Federal Marshals were to enter the building and ask for proof of ownership.
Each Presidential candidate is asked to talk about morals and ethics in this campaign to put
pressure
on Verizon
Audit
Committee
to obey SOX 301
Will Verizon Audit Committee be part of the problem or part of the
solution
???
Phone Fraud by Ed McGinty, Verizon Security, 5055 North Point Parkway, Alpharetta, Georgia 30022, (678) 259-5484
Morning of Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Ed McGinty was asked very specifically if he claims his investigation found valid software licenses for our department
specifically for the date of September 8th, 2003, when Leon King tried to force me to feloniously load and use this software
when Dave Vermilyea had just spent a good fifteen minutes telling him how illegal that would be to do.
Ed McGinty knowingly and with full conviction stated very clearly that our department had valid licenses for that specific date.
MapInfo only has records for this purchase starting in May of 2004 and a verbal agreement starting in November 2003
Ed McGinty absolutely knew that he was committing phone fraud when he made this statement.
Note that on April 18, 2007, the fraud unit of Verizon, (800) 997-3287, was advised of this specific factual phone fraud, this website, and
that the company is admitting absolute guilt because they cannot get a judge to make me remove this.
Sarbanes Oxley only requires "reasonable belief". This statement staying here
(05/24/08, 402 days since 4/18/07)
clearly shows "proof beyond reasonable doubt that Verizon CANNOT provide truthful verification of ownership".
Any reasonable person realizes that if Verizon could provide truthful verification of ownership, they would have provided it long before now.
Money buys justice in this country, but even someone poor like me can get justice in the court of public opinion, by trusting in God.
-------------------------
'What you want does not exist.
MCI has licenses and in order to give you "proof" that they have not exceeded their licenses you would need to be shown each and every computer at MCI so you could count which ones had the software installed on it to make sure the licenses were not exceeded.
This is not going to happen. It would be unduly burdensome.'
Email from MCI lawyer admitting out right that my department could have never passed a software raid.
For example, MapInfo had every right to get federal marshals to do a court ordered software raid, for example in September 2003.
These armed federal marshals would have NEVER allowed this kind of bizarre twisted logic.
Anyone with an average IQ or above would realize that any company with that poor of tracking of company property
could not possibly know when it became neccessary to purchase more licenses.
Federal marshals with loaded guns are simply not that patient to wait to search every computer in a fifty thousand person company.
After the fact, lawyers have to look for proof of ownership in other departments,
with nothing to tie ownership to my department and having no way of knowing how many other
departments were stealing it as well. There is no possible way to know how many thousands upon thousands
of pirated software existed in the past time frames when these crimes occurred.
Only immoral, illegal, and unethical lawyer trickery can keep CEO Ivan Seidenberg out of prison with this kind of twisted logic.
I ask each Presidential candidate to search your inner most convictions and ask yourself:
"Did our Founding Fathers intend for my family to suffer religious prosecution
because the God I choose to worship insists that I obey the law???"
Did Virginia Tech influence the Supreme Court's Ruling on Partial Birth Abortion???
Proud Member of
Moral Majority
Governor Huckabee on Stem Cell Research
Each 2008 potential Presidential candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you reasonably believe that
if Verizon had purchased Worldcom/MCI several years earlier, would they have covered up the earlier
multi-billion dollar fraud in the same manner they are currently covering up the
potentially multi-billion dollar stolen intellectual property fraud.
Senator Brownback on Stem Cell Research
Transparency or Bust
---------------------------------
Each 2008 Potential Presidential candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you consider
basing profits on stolen property to be within the
"PURVIEW OF STOCKHOLDER FRAUD".
---------------------------------
4/11/07 Open letter to United States Senate Judiciary committee located at http://whitehouse08.info
I lowered my guard as a direct result of the Sarbanes Oxley act starting in August of 2003 and started objecting to being feloniously required to load and use rampant pirated software at Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon. The stolen property, including potential fines, was over ten million dollars in just our five person group alone, which represented only one ten thousandth of the company. The Verizon criminal cover up that has ensued leads any reasonable person to conclude that the issue was far more wide spread then just our department, easily into the billions of dollars.
Instead of billion dollar profits, this could very well mean billion dollar loses of this fully owned subsidiary of Verizon.
I have asked the Verizon Audit Committee to request receipts, which, excluding mock purchases, we know the company can't provide. As long as US Judgeship nominee Thomas Farr's law firm continues to falsely claim in court documents that there was never any pirated software at this company, this puts tremendous pressure on potential witnesses such as Kavitha Ranganathan, Dave Vermilyea, Jeff Showers, and others to commit perjury to substantiate this flagrantly false claim. I am asking the United States Senate Judiciary committee to forward this letter to the FBI for the protection of my family.
I have full confidence that the Verizon Audit Committee, as an independent unit, will do the right thing and bring a halt to this madness. Once the Verizon Audit Committee asks to be shown these receipts, which will immediately halt this madness because the receipts don't exist, my family will be made whole because this will force US Judgeship nominee Thomas Farr's law firm to correct the court documents. All I ask is back pay and my good name back. That will make my family whole.
As noted above, I lowered my guard BECAUSE of the Sarbanes Oxley act. Please thank the Verizon Audit Committee once they ask for these receipts. Basing profits on stolen property, possibly in the billions of dollars, clearly defrauds stock holders. The Verizon Audit Committee needs your gratitude once they have asked for these receipts. Thank you.
Alvin Reed
(919) 774-1209
Alvin_R_Reed@yahoo.com
481 Lydia Perry Road
Sanford, NC 27330
CC: Verizon Audit Committee
The Sanctity of Life: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeX8KLd0eXI
Same-Sex Marriage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtgJmK05KHU
Immigration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFOTP98vLzo
Education: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UnxHV35ozE
Health Care: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8b-Dz2-ANA
Arts and Education: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-Pd3IpXK50
Faith and Politics: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCCq2AeAnX8
Taxes and Economy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzXouDT1Y9k
National Security and Foreign Policy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fowwzO-BlA
Israel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVkYAZmkwaA
Paraphrased implication of any 2008 Presidential candidate who refuses to take corporate corruption seriously.
American Solutions: Speaker Gingrich
Every 2008 Presidential candidate is asked to explain to the American people how Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, can claim
to have a zero tolerance policy when my family is suffering while my manager, Frank Adams, is still a Verizon manager!!!
--------------------
2-04-04 I send an email to my manager, Frank Adams, complaining of being forced to use stolen property against my will.
“Frank. For the record. I have loaded a copy of Homesite V4.5.1 SN HS45PE-3997633545 onto my computer using what is obviously a bootlegged CD based on your email assurance that we have sufficient licenses on file to cover this software. Alvin. Copy to File.”
My mental state at this point for putting “Copy to File” on the bottom of my email was for my own protection if Federal Marshals were to enter the building and ask for proof of ownership.
--------------------
Proof that this serial number was stolen was on my wall at work, along with a entire set of other evidence,
but this evidence was feloniously destroyed by Worldcom/MCI, now Verzon, as part of a
VERIZON CRIMINAL COVER UP.
Every 2008 Presidential candidate is asked to comment on whether or not Pamela Hogg had a Constitutional right
to require Alvin Reed to commit a felony as a condition of employment.
In your response, please remember that Alvin Reed could spend up to five years in a federal penitentiary
if unable to show duress.
--------------------------
8-22-03 I send an email to the FLPS project manager, Pamela Hogg, complaining of being forced to use stolen property against my will.
“Pamela, Can you export the project plan into Microsoft Word Format? I don’t thank we have a site license for Microsoft Project and I don’t have a personal copy. Thanks. Alvin”
Her response was to tell me where the pirated CD was located.
a
Every 2008 Presidential Candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you consider a prognosis of situational anxiety
to the commission of felonies to be a legitimate reason to retaliate against an employee through wrongful termination.
-----------------------------
"...I am once again losing a lot of sleep over the issue of being pressured to
use software of questionable ownership..."
Alvin Reed in email to manager Frank Adams on January 31st, 2004, time stamped at 1:27 A.M. (middle of the night)
Alvin Reed was diagnosed with
caused directly by this forced
commission of felonies.
Alvin Reed's termination letter stated very cleary the reason for his termination: "prognosis of your doctor"
Every 2008 Presidential Candidate is asked to comment on whether or not you consider
the forced commission of felonies
a legitimate laissez faire corporate strategy.
----------------- reference -------------------------
9-08-03 I noted this date on a later email to Frank Adams as the day of this encounter.
Dave
Vermilyea
spends about fifteen minutes screaming at Leon King at the top of his lungs, just a few feet behind me, how illegal it would be to put Ma[p]Xtreme on our computers. Within seconds of Dave Vermilyea walking away, Leon King shoves the CD in my direction telling me to put it on my computer. I lose a week’s worth of sleep from this encounter because even though we did not report to or work for Leon King, he and Pamela Hogg worked extremely closely. It was well understood that he would immediately tell Pamela Hogg, who would tell our manager, if we did not put MapXtreme on our computer. My wife, Donna Reed, has agreed to testify to my loss of sleep and my mental state during this general time frame.
I feel led by a Higher Power to spend the rest of my natural life fighting
corporate corruption,
with every
fiber
of my being, not only the symptoms, but the root causes as well.
Every United States citizen has a choice, to either hate me or help me in this God given pursuit.
Alvin Reed
March 23, 2007
Brownback on respecting marriage and abstinence
"A free market cannot include the freedom
to cheat, to defraud or to steal."
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
"And this law says to every American: there will not be a different ethical standard for
corporate America than the standard that applies to everyone else. The honesty you expect
in your small businesses, or in your workplaces, in your community or in your home, will
be expected and enforced in every corporate suite in this country."
President Bush signs SOX bill
If
Governor Huckabee
will agree to
uphold
the US Constitution to fight
corporate corruption
then I will strongly support him above all other announced candidates for President in 08
Proud Member of Moral Majority
Real Change requires Real Change
Newt Gingrich
Please ask each potential 08 presidential candidate the following question:
"If elected President in 2008, would you have the moral courage to sign into law a bill that includes
17 US Code 506
in
18 US Code 1514A
knowing in advance that
corporations of questionable
ethics
threatened to reduce their contributions
to your campaign in retaliation for your willingness to sign this bill?"
concerned citizen
___________________________
Dear concerned citizen,
The recent US Supreme Court ruling in June of last year,
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v White, Case No. 05-259, says in part,
“...could well dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.”
In this US code noted above, it would be religious discrimination for Christian employees
to be required to load and use stolen intellectual property, because it is clearly
against the teachings of Jesus Christ to commit felonies.
The Business Software Alliance (BSA) states that one in five software programs in corporate America
is stolen intellectual property and a felony, up to five years in a federal penitentiary,
to load and use this stolen property. Thus, it is statistically impossible for Christians
to practice our religion in corporate America.
With this in mind, and in accordance with Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co. v White,
whitehouse08.info proudly proposes the question you ask to the
2008 potential presidential candidates and will ask each to respond.
Also, please ask the 2008 potential Presidential candidates if they will have the intellect to
fully comprehend the positive impact to our economy by enforcing section 1107 of the Sarbanes Oxley act,
even though they will be merclessly pressured by big business to not enforce this law.
SEC. 1107. RETALIATION AGAINST INFORMANTS.
(a) IN GENERAL-Section 1513 of title 18, United States Code,
is amended by adding at the end the following:
"(e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes
any action harmful to any person, including interference with the
lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to
a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the
commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years.
or both.".
concerned citizen
"We need a culture that encourages what is right and discourages what is wrong—and has the wisdom to understand the difference."
Senator Brownback
Dear Pastor,
As our Sunday School teacher, you have asked us for questions that you can
answer during our class.
Here is my question:
Where in the Bible does it say it is OK to commit felonies to feed my family?
Here is the background to my question:
The Business Software Alliance (BSA) states that one in every five software
programs in use today in corporate America is stolen property, which carries
a criminal penalty of up to five years in a federal penitentiary.
Given the number of software programs that almost all employees are
required to load and use as a condition of employment, it is statistically
impossible to work in corporate America without having to feloniously load
and use this stolen intellectual property.
I have spent over two years searching for a corporation that is willing,
in both words and actions,
to provide a means of not being required to load and use this stolen
intellectual property. There are none. To work in corporate America,
a Christian must commit these felonies, and not as much as flinch
in the commission of these felonies, if they want to keep their job.
Most Christians have learned
to look the other way because they know they have no choice.
Thank you for addressing this ethical paradox.
Alvin
Donna Reed's Affidavit
"The Judge said that if my husband did not want to commit felonies, he should quit." Donna Reed
Alvin,
I just took a look at your new site. It is terrific. I am looking forward to visiting it often as we head into the 2008 election. Thanks for a terrific site.
Ginny Desiderio
To: Dave Vermilyea
Dear Dave,
Thomas Farr's law firm has stated in court documents that there was never any pirated software at MCI.
Noted below is a list of software items that MCI cannot provide receipts or anything else tying ownership back to your department.
We have very good reason to believe that you are in fear for your job to provide truthful information to authorities regarding this stolen property. You do not need to take any action to verify this. If you are NOT in fear for your job to bring truthful information to authorities, please reply to info@SBMratings.com, or if you cannot do that, please reply to Senator [a] or Senator [b]. We advice you to obtain their contact information directly for your own verification assurance. If you are NOT in fear for your job, you will be required to state under oath, in a court of law, that you have in your possession verification of ownership, during relevant time frame, of items in question noted below.
Please study the information at http://www.bsa.org to see how federal marshalls come into a business with loaded guns and require all employees to step away from your computers. These federal marshalls stand over employees as you rummage through filing cabinets trying to find receipts, or anything else to tie ownership back to your department. These federal marshalls can get very impatient and this fear can cause situational anxiety for employees strong in faith who are taught that there is a Higher Power watching over our every move. It is these receipts that you and other employees in your department would have been able to provide these armed federal marshalls that you will be allowed to provide in this court of law. The ownership must be able to be tied back to the department during the relavent time frame, otherwise, there is no way for the court to know just how rampant pirated software really was.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
SBM Ratings Network
info@SBMratings.com
P.S. Dave, you have presented yourself as an avid athiest. As such, you have a unique opportunity to make or break the candidacy of Senator Hillary Clinton, as the 2008 Presidential candidate for the secular progressive party. Does moral fiber require belief in a Higher Power? That is your question to answer. Dave, how you proceed on this matter with regard to candor to the tribunal could have profound affect on whether or not Senator Clinton gets any votes at all from persons of faith. Senator Clinton, you have a vested interest in insuring that Dave, as an avid athiest, is not in fear for his job to tell the truth about the rampant pirated software at Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon and will do the right thing to tell the truth even though he is an avid secular progressive. Senator Clinton, by copy of the email, I am asking you to NOT vote for Thomas Farr to the federal judgeship unless or until his law firm starts abiding by NC Bar Rule 3.3.
---------------- reference ---------------------------------------------
Leon King - HomeSite (At least three verbal requests, two of which had one or more witnesses)
Frank Adams - HomeSite (At least five emails that I can think of)
Leon King - MapXTreme (At least two verbal requests, one with a witness)
Pamela Hogg - MapXTreme (Two verbal requests and several emails, one of which I have copies of)
Frank Adams - MapXTreme (At least five emails that I remember)
Leon King - Oracle (Multiple verbal requests from Dave Vermilyea)
Pamela Hogg - Oracle (Multiple verbal requests from Dave Vermilyea, possible emails as well)
Frank Adams - Oracle (Multiple verbal requests from Dave Vermilyea, possible emails as well)
Leon King - Toad (Multiple verbal requests from Dave Vermilyea)
Pamela Hogg - Toad (Multiple verbal request from Dave Vermilyea and myself)
Leon King - Microsoft Project (At least 2 verbal and one email request)
Pamela Hogg - Microsoft Project (Two verbal requests and several emails, one of which I have copies of)
Frank Adams - Microsoft Project (Five emails, one department phone meeting with multiple witnesses)
Coulter on Democrats
Giuliani not in favor with moral majority
Wall Street Journal January 12 2007
Newt Gingrich Rudy Giuliani
The American mission in Iraq must succeed. Our goal -- promoting a stable, accountable democracy in the heart of the Middle East -- cannot be achieved by purely military means.
Iraqis need to establish a civil society. Without the support of mediating civic and social associations -- the informal ties that bind us together -- no government can long remain stable and no cohesive nation can be maintained. To establish a civil society, Iraqis must rebuild their basic infrastructure. Iraqis must take control of their destiny by rebuilding houses, stores, schools, roads, highways, mosques and churches.
But the constant threat of violence, combined with a high unemployment rate estimated between 30% and 50%, fundamentally undermines that effort. This not only sustains the fertile breeding ground for terrorist recruiters but has the same corrosive effect as it would in any city -- raising the likelihood of further violence, civic decay and a crippling sense of powerlessness.
A massive effort must be made to engage in a well organized plan to rebuild Iraq. The goal: an infrastructure to support and encourage a strong, stable civil society.
9-29-03 I send an email to the FLPS project manager, Pamela Hogg, complaining of being forced to use stolen property against my will.
“Pamela, For the record, I am not comfortable using Map Extreme until we have something in writing from MapInfo extending our 30 day trial.
The Wednesday call may be a good time to ask. I don’t think they will have any objections to us using their Unix/Java versions since we are converting from Windows to Java; however, it does need to be in writing just to be on the safe side. Alvin”
Note that our 30 day trial ended sometime in 2000, several years earlier. MapXtreme agreed to a new 30 day trial around November of 2003. MapXtreme and I discussed on the phone a number of times during the first half of 2004 that we were long past our 30 day, or even 60 day trial.
Sarbanes Oxley
SEC. 802. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR ALTERING DOCUMENTS.
(a) IN GENERAL- Chapter 73 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:`Sec. 1519. Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy. `Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.`Sec. 1520. Destruction of corporate audit records
---------------------------
Worldcom was under Bankruptcy Court Order to reduce cost on three projects by nine million dollars.
The Reed v MCI case clearly shows flagrant and blatant impedement by Worldcom of the administration of this Worldcom Bankruptcy Court Order,
a clear and deliberate violation of section 802 of SOX.
I am willing to stand behind any presidential candidate, of either party,
in 2008, who is willing to take a public stand to talk about character
and intend to do everything within my power to influence a million votes in this election.
I will look for the candidate's position to this issue on this website.
concerned citizen
Dear Mr. Reed:
I am writing in response to your e-mail, dated March 7, 2007, to the Criminal Division of the
Department of Justice requesting an investigation into a complex matter concerning allegations
of a criminal cover-up by Verizon and the veracity of certain court documents.
If you believe that a federal criminal law has been violated, you can report this to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The FBI is the investigative arm of the
Department of Justice and the FBI will do the initial fact finding for possible
federal criminal fraud cases.
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
http://www.portland.fbi.gov
The FBI will first determine whether a federal investigation may be warranted, and if appropriate,
refer the matter to a United States Attorney for a final determination.
http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
The FBI's Charlotte office is located at Wachovia Building, 400 South Tyron Street, Suite 900, Charlotte,
North Carolina 28285-0001. That office may be contacted by phone at (704) 377-9200 or online at
http://www.portland.fbi.gov .
With respect to your comments regarding the correction of court documents, you need to seek the advice of
private counsel in order to explore what legal rights or remedies you may have. If you cannot afford a
private attorney, you may wish to contact your state or local bar association to see if they can refer
you to a reduced fee attorney or resources that offer free legal help. The mailing address for the
North Carolina Bar Association is P.O. Box 3688, Cary,
NC 27519-3688. You may contact them directly at (919) 677-0561 or visit their website at www.ncbar.org
http://www.ncbar.org/.
Thank you for seeking our assistance
________________________________
From: areed [mailto:alvin_r_reed@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wed 3/7/2007 10:34 AM
To: ASKDOJ@jmdpub.doj.gov
Cc: Division, Criminal
Subject: Obstruction of Justice as a legal strategy
To US DOJ Criminal Divison,
Please investigate why Verizon Security believes that they can NOT correct court documents even if their new investigation finds the court documents to be completely false in materials facts. Does that not indeed constitute a criminal cover up by Verizon?
Below is the email I sent to Senator Clinton on the day that the Verizon Officer made this admission to me on the phone.
Thank you.
Alvin Reed
Alvin_R_Reed@yahoo.com
(919) 774-1209
481 Lydia Perry Road
Sanford, NC 27330
P.S. I have this and much more at http://www.ethics101.org which specifically points out that this is a Verizon Criminal Cover Up and if it were not, then Verizon would take action to require me to take down this website. I have forwarded this website to many officials so Verizon cannot argue that they are ignoring it. Please take into consideration that Verizon is doing nothing to take down my website at http://www.ethics101.org .
----- Original Message -----
From: areed
To: thomas.farr@ogletreedeakins.com
Cc: Senator_Clinton@clinton.senate.gov
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Obstruction of Justice as a legal strategy
Memo to file (I am copying Senator Clinton on this email to protect my family should Verizon take retalitory steps against me for pointing out admissions of a criminal cover up by Verizon, I am asking Senator Clinton to forward this email to the FBI)
There was a disturbing anonymous call with Verizon security officer, Ed Mcginty (678-259-5484), this morning. This is with regard to Verizon Ethics office re-opening my case that I brought to the MCI ethics office in January of 2005. The anonymous Verizon case number is VER07010128, pin T595.
It was quite clear that Verizon security did in fact re-open the case and allegedly agreed to look at both old and new facts that are completely out of sink with what Mr Farr's law firm is stating in court documents with regard to whether or not there was pirated software at Worldcom/MCI. Ed Mcginty and the anonymous caller did confer that Steve Helvin never actually said that Alvin Reed was fired for "drinking on the job", that it was only inferred. The anonymous caller did tell Ed Mdginty that Steve Helvin did clearly intend to defame the character of Alvin Reed to make it appear that Alvin Reed was fired for some other reason then refusing to commit felonies. The example given by Steve Helvin was "drinking on the job". I absolutely consider this to be wrongful defamation of character, false, and slandeous and a clear attempt by Steve Helvin to cover up the real facts in this case.
Just for the record, one statement that Ed Mcginty made that was absolutely wrong was to say that Alvin Reed could not just decide to not show up for work because the investigation was not complete. Whoever provided this information to Ed Mcginty had clearly left out the fact that I was on doctors care to not commit felonies because of the situtational anxiety that the commission of felonies, and resulting hostile environment, caused me. If the reciepts or any indication of ownership are not found (which they cannot possibly be found since that don't exist), then Ed Mcginty is once again stating that Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, employees must commit felonies as a condition of employement even though they know absolutely that it is felonies and the company, even to this day, cannot find any indication that this property was paid for, thus stolen, thus felonious. Ed Mcginty inferred that the MCI ethics office told Alvin Reed (me) that the property was not stolen. Ed Mcginty was corrected by the anonymous caller, but made no indication that he would use the corrected information in his investigation.
Towards the end of the call, Ed Mcginty was asked if he would take steps to correct the court documents stating there was no pirated software if his investigation found no receipts or any indication of tracking how many copies of software where being used, other then the couple of mock purchases after many complaints. Based on all the new evidence, a new investigation that found that the ownership was not there would indicate that Rick's signed statement and my testimony throughout where indeed correct, that the software was stolen. The company cannot argue poor record keeping because management was advised repeatedly since August of 2003 of the affect on my health any software of questionable ownership caused me.
Ed Mcginty made it very clear that he would NOT see to it that the court documents are corrected, which would clearly be an attempt by Verizon security to cover up the stolen property. By the spirit and letter of SOX law and numerous other state and federal laws, it is illegal to cover up stolen property when court documents claim that the property was not stolen.
It was made clear to Ed Mcginty that this would constitute a criminal cover-up if his new investigation revealed that the company could not find the receipts or any indication of tracking how many, other the the mock purchases, when other evidence clearly shows that the company was repeatedly advised of the stolen property. Ed Mcginty at that point threatened to sue the anonymous caller for accusing him of being part of a criminal cover up. The anonymous caller had done no such thing. The anonymous caller was only pointing out that after the investigation, if the receipts or indication of ownership was not found, and the court documents were not corrected, then, by definition, that would constitute a criminal cover up. Ed Mcginty's words and demeanor indicated that he had seemed to have already decided to be part of what he knew would have to be a criminal cover up.
Because I know the facts in the case, I am stating here that I, Alvin Reed, in sound mind and body am absolutely saying that if this new investigation does in fact show that their was pirated software (which it will if actually done), and the court documents that claim there was not pirated software are not corrected, then this would indeed be a criminal cover-up. To sue me for saying this, the company would have to show verification of ownership. I have never questioned that there was a small amount of mock purchases made and I clearly point out that that is not what I am referring to. I am referring to all the other stolen property.
If Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon, plans to sue me for pointing out the fact that a future event where a criminal cover up might occur, would in deed be a criminal cover up if done, then I advise Thomas Farr's law firm that they would have to provide a multitude of forged documents to make the case for Thomas Farr's law firm. Just this morning, MapInfo, once again, verbally confirmed the absense of verification of ownership for all the MapInfo software used illegally between August of 2003 and May of 2004. Thomas Farr's law firm cannot possibly provide verification of ownership of the MapInfo software during that time without it being forged documents.
Alvin Reed
|