May 21, 2007 URL: http://whitehouse08.info/vac_052107.html


To: Verizon Audit Committee


CC: US Senate Judiciary Committee, DOL, FBI, Media



Question of the day (May 21, 2007):

In RR v White, June of 2005, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is illegal to dissuade a reasonable worker from complaining in the first place. Co-workers of Alvin Reed know the facts and have watched Alvin Reed's family being prosecuted for over two years now. These witnesses know how Alvin Reed fought against pirated software for all those years, the facts are clear in the emails to his manager.

These co-workers know how Alvin Reed created a million map a day solution, per the Worldcom bankruptcy court order to reduce cost on three projects by nine millions dollars. These co-workers know that, without his help, the project manager has yet, even as of May 2007, still not abided by that Worldcom bankruptcy court order.

Is "GETTING AWAY WITH IT" a legitimate laissez faire market strategy for a corrupt corporate to follow?

Is "EBBERS ECONOMICS" really the kind of corruption we want our country headed?




Alvin Reed, (919) 774-1209, Alvin_R_Reed@yahoo.com, 481 Lydia Perry Road, Sanford, NC 27330









Question of the day (May 20, 2007):

Alvin Reed was required to commit felonies as a condition of employment at Worldcom/MCI, now Verizon. Armed Federal Marshals could have come into Alvin Reed's department at any time and hauled him off to a federal penitentiary, if unable to show duress. After the Enron / Worldcom corruption, Congress enacted the Sarbanes Oxley act to lower the guard of employees. Alvin Reed fell for this, started objecting in August of 2003, and was fired based on the prognosis of his doctor, situational anxiety as a direct result of being required to commit these crimes. The CEO of John Deere is on the Verizon Audit Committee and has closed an investigation of this flagrant retaliation without correcting the court documents which frauduantly claim there was never any pirated software at this company.

Should the Board of Directors of John Deere be proud of their CEO for allowing employees to be retaliated against for objecting to the commission of felonies?

Is a belief by corporate America that they think they are going to get away with these kinds of flagrant retaliation something that the country should be proud of?